The focal point of wellbeing and wellbeing experts today is on ailment and issues – as it were, what’s going on (negative wellbeing). Wouldn’t you rather be concentrating rather on positive wellbeing, or at the end of the day, what’s correct? site de saúde
Wellbeing today has a malady center – an emphasis on hazard decrease, evasion, aversion and treatment of illness, sickness and handicap. This center stems, no uncertainty, from medication and its attention on pathogenesis, which is the investigation of the root of sickness. In a pathogenic model – wellbeing is estimated by the frequency of infection or wellbeing related issues. Achievement in the pathogenic model is estimated by the shirking or disposal of issues, maladies and unexpected passing.
Wellbeing is regularly portrayed similar to a continuum, with one end being sudden passing and the opposite end being health. The mid-purpose of the continuum is regularly portrayed just like an impartial point where no perceivable disease or health can be distinguished. In the event that achievement in the pathogenic model is the evasion or end of issues or sickness, at that point accomplishment for this situation this does not make a condition of wellbeing, but rather a point there is no perceivable ailment or health. The advancement of wellbeing or the development towards health would then necessitate that conscious, explicit solid moves to be made.
The need of taking purposeful, solid activity to accomplish ideal wellbeing, positive wellbeing or abnormal state health would be steady with what analysts have found in different zones. Specialists have demonstrated that taking out negatives alone does not, all by itself, make positive conditions. A few precedents that show what I am stating would include:
• Herzberg who demonstrated that wiping out disappointment does not make fulfillment
• Compton who demonstrated that wiping out dejection does not make happiness
• Seligman who demonstrated that psychological well-being was not the unimportant nonattendance of dysfunctional behavior
• Becker and associates who demonstrated that consummation infection does not make positive wellbeing
Rather than going for an arrival to impartial or the norm, an emphasis on positive wellbeing moves our concentration towards results that surpass our desires, at the end of the day, our admired results.
Positive wellbeing has its underlying foundations in the salutogenesis display. Salutogenesis gives a concentration and strategy to find and build up the causes or inceptions of positive wellbeing. Salutogenesis supplements pathogenesis by attempting to enhance wellbeing and prosperity through consistent and endless enhancement. Salutogenesis is about how to include positive activities, openings, conditions and results to move us past the unbiased point to higher, positive dimensions.
Positive wellbeing is an intentional consciouly made powerful state. Positive wellbeing has beed depicted also being, flourishing or prospering.
To accomplish and constantly enhance positive wellbeing, a strong, sustaining and empowering condition must be deliberately and insightfully created and persistently progressed. This steady and supporting condition is an important fixing in the conduct change process.
Positive states are made through purposeful, cognizant exertion and activity. To make positive states, explicit endeavors must be taken that go just past the disposal of wellbeing dangers and issues. These explicit endeavors should be upheld using following 9 Es and 1 C:
Utilize these 9 Es and 1 C in your worksite wellbeing project to enable your representatives to accomplish positive wellbeing.
In the event that you are keen on perusing more, think about these references:
Antonovsky, A. (1979) Health, stress and adapting. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Becker, C. M., Dolbier, C.L., Durham, T., Glascoff, M. An., and Adams, T.B. Improvement and fundamental assessment of the legitimacy and dependability of a positive wellbeing scale. (2008). American Journal of Health Education, 39(1), 34-41.
Becker, C. M., Moore, J., Whetstone, L., Glascoff, M., Chaney, E., Felts, M., and Anderson, L., (2009). Legitimacy Evidence for the Salutogenic Wellness Promotion Scale (SWPS). American Journal of Health Behavior, 33(4), 455-465.
Becker, C., Glascoff, M., and Felts, W. (2010) Salutogenesis 30 years after the fact: Where do we go from here? Universal Electronic Journal of Health Education, 13, 25-32.